Effect of different phytohormones on in vitro multiplication of Solanum tuberosum L. var. Cecilia
Autores/as
-
Michel Leiva Mora
Laboratorio de Biotecnología. Departamento de Agronomía, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias (Universidad Técnica de Ambato/ Ambato, Ecuador)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1846-4060
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70099/BJ/2024.01.03.22Palabras clave:
buds, growth regulators, potato, tissue cultureResumen
Phytohormones are widely used in Solanum tuberosum plants to accelerate the in vitro multiplication process. The main objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of different concentrations of phytohormones: auxins (IAA, IBA, NAA), cytokinins (6-BAP, TDZ, Zeatin), and gibberellins (GA3) on the morphological characteristics of Solanum tuberosum L. var. Cecilia. In vitro established plants were used, and the in vitro multiplication was performed using nodal segments cultured in MS medium supplemented with 20 g.L⁻¹ sucrose, 7 g.L⁻¹ agar, and phytohormones. The plants were maintained under total fluorescent white light conditions. The number of nodes, number of leaves, plant height, and number of shoots were evaluated. At 21 days, the use of IBA (0.05 mg. L⁻¹ and 0.25 mg. L⁻¹) increased the number of nodes and the number of leaves. Meanwhile, Zeatin concentrations of 0.05 mg. L⁻¹ and 0.1 mg. L⁻¹ increased the number of leaves, plant height, and number of shoots. Additionally, the concentration of 0.15 mg. L⁻¹ increased the plant height compared to GA3, and the concentration of 0.15 mg. L⁻¹ increased the number of nodes in S. tuberosum var. Cecilia plants. Based on the results of this study, it was concluded that IBA, Zeatin, and GA3 promoted the in vitro multiplication of S. tuberosum var. Cecilia plants.
Citas
1. De Haan, S.; Rodriguez, F. Potato origin and production. In J. Singh & L. Kaur (Eds.). Advances in Potato Chemistry ,and Technology. London, UK: Academic Press, Elsevier: 2016, 2, 1-32.
2. Reddy; B. J., Mandal, R.; Chakroborty, M.; Hijam, L.; Dutta P. A review on potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) and its genetic diversity. Int J Genet. 2018; ISSN (0975-2862).
3. FAOSTAT. Food and Agricultural Organization Statistical database, Crop production. http://faostat3.fao.org/download /Q/QC/ E, 2017.
4. Alexandrova, A. M.; Karpova, O. V.; Nargilova, R. M.; Kryldakov, R. V.; Nizkorodova, A. S.; Zhigaylov, A. V.; ... & Iskakov, B. K. Distribution of potato (Solanum tuberosum) viruses in Kazakhstan. International Journal of Biology and Chemistry: 2018, 11(1), 33-40.
5. Yuen, J. Pathogens which threaten food security: Phytophthora infestans, the potato late blight pathogen. Food Security: 2021, 13(2), 247-253.
6. Ivanov, A. A.; Ukladov, E. O.; Golubeva, T. S. Phytophthora infestans: An overview of methods and attempts to combat late blight. Journal of Fungi: 2021, 7(12), 1071.
7. Guha Roy, S.; Dey, T.; Cooke, D. E.; Cooke, L. R. The dynamics of Phytophthora infestans populations in the major potato‐growing regions of Asia–A review. Plant Pathology: 2021, 70(5), 1015-1031.
8. Xiang, Q. J; Judelson, H. S. Myb Transcription Factors and Light Regulate Sporulation in the Oomycete Phytophthora infestans. PloS one, 9(4).
9. Haverkort, A. J.; Struik, P. C.; Visser, R. G. F.; Jacobsen, E. Applied biotechnology to combat late blight in potato caused by Phytophthora infestans. Potato Res. 2009, 52, 249–264.
10. Antonova, O. Y.; Apalikova, O. V.; Ukhatova, Y. V.; Krylova, E. A.; Shuvalov, O. Y.; Shuvalova, A. R.; Gavrilenko, T. A. Eradication of viruses in microplants of three cultivated potato species (Solanum tuberosum L., S. phureja Juz. & Buk., S. stenotomum Juz. & Buk.) using combined thermo-chemotherapy method. Sel’skokhozyaistvennaya Biol: 2017, 52, 95-104.
11. Kreuze, J. F.; Souza-Dias, J. A. C.; Jeevalatha, A.; Figueira, A. R.; Valkonen, J. P. T.; Jones, R. A. C. Viral diseases in potato. The potato crop: its agricultural, nutritional and social contribution to humankind: 2020, 389-430.
12. Naik, P. S.; Buckseth, T. Recent advances in virus elimination and tissue culture for quality potato seed production. Biotechnologies of Crop Improvement: Cellular Approaches: 2018, 1, 131-158.
13. Singh, R. K.; Buckseth, T.; Tiwari, J. K.; Sharma, A. K.; Singh, V.; Kumar, D.; ... & Chakrabarti, S. K. Seed potato (Solanum tuberosum) production systems in India: A chronological outlook. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences: 2019, 89(4), 578-587.
14. Badoni, A.; Chauhan, J. S. Importance of potato micro tuber seed material for farmers of Uttarakhand Hills. International Journal of Sustainable Agriculture: 2010, 2(1), 01-09.
15. Halterman, D.; Guenthner, J.; Collinge, S.; Butler, N.; Douches, D. Biotech potatoes in the 21st century: 20 years since the first biotech potato. American journal of potato research: 2016, 93, 1-20.
16. Shaheb, M. R.; Begum, M. M.; Ahmed, K. U.; Nazrul, M. I.; Wiersema, S. G. Challenges of seed potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) production and supply system in Bangladesh–A review. The Agriculturists: 2016, 13(1): 173–88
17. Espinosa-Leal, C. A.; Puente-Garza, C. A.; García-Lara, S. In vitro plant tissue culture: means for production of biological active compounds. Planta: 2018, 248, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-018-2910-1
18. Abdalla, N.; El-Ramady, H.; Seliem, M. K.; El-Mahrouk, M. E.; Taha, N.; Bayoumi, Y.; Shalaby, T. A.; Dobránszki, J. An Academic and Technical Overview on Plant Micropropagation Challenges. Horticulturae: 2022, 8, 677. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8080677
19. Tripathi, M. K.; Tiwari, S.; Tripathi, N.; Tiwari, G.; Bhatt, D.; Vibhute, M.; ... Tiwari, S. Plant Tissue Culture Techniques for Conservation of Biodiversity of Some Plants Appropriate for Propagation in Degraded and Temperate Areas. Current Topics in Agricultural Sciences; BP International Publisher: Bhanjipur, India: 2021, 4, 30-60. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/ctas/v4/2119C
20. Altpeter, F.; Springer, N. M.; Bartley, L. E.; Blechl, A. E.; Brutnell, T. P.; Citovsky, V.; Conrad, L.; Gelvin, S. B.; Jackson, D.; Kausch, A. P.; Lemaux, P. G.; ... Stewart, C. N. Advancing crop transformation in the era of genome editing. The Plant Cell: 2016, 28,1510-1520. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.16.00196
21. Rani, A.; Donovan, N., Mantri, N. The future of plant pathogen diagnostics in a nursery production system. Biosensors and Bioelectronics: 2019, 145, 111631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2019.111631
22. Pe, P. P.; Naing, A. H.; Soe, M. T.; Kang, H.; Parque, K. I.; Kim, C. K. Establishment of meristem culture for virus-free and genetically stable production of the endangered plant Hosta capitata. Scientia Horticulturae: 2020, 272, 109591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109591
23. Xhulaj, D.; Gixhari, B. In vitro micropropagation of potato (Solanum tuberosum L). cultivars. Agriculture & Forestry: 2018, 64(4), 105. https://doi.org/10.17707/AgricultForest.64.4.12
24. Kumar, N.; Reddy, M. P. In vitro plant propagation: a review. Journal of forest and environmental science: 2011, 27(2), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.7747/JFS.2011.27.2.1
25. Khan, M. T.; Yasmeen, S.; Khan, I. Genetic dissection of sugarcane germplasm for yield and yield contributing characteristics under Tandojam agro-climatic conditions. Proc. 7th Int. 16th Nat. Conf. Plant Res. Curr. Trends, Challeng. Solut. Peshawar, Pak: 2018, 23-26.
26. Bridgen, M. P.; Van Houtven, W.; Eeckhaut, T. Plant tissue culture techniques for breeding. Ornamental crops: 2018, 11, 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90698-0_6
27. Gupta, N.; Jain, V.: Joseph, M. R.; Devi, S. A review on micropropagation culture method. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Development: 2020, 8(1), 86-93. https://doi.org/10.22270/ajprd.v8i1.653
28. Villegas-Sánchez, E.; Macías-Alonso, M.; Osegueda-Robles, S.; Herrera-Isidrón, L.; Nuñez-Palenius, H.; González-Marrero, J. In Vitro Culture of Rosmarinus officinalis L. in a Temporary Immersion System: Influence of Two Phytohormones on Plant Growth and Carnosol Production. Pharmaceuticals: 2021, 14, 747. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14080747
29. Malviya, R. K.; Tripathi, M. K.; Vidhyashankar, M.; Patel, R. P.; Ahuja, A. Effect of different phytohormones on plant regeneration of gladiolus (Gladiolus hybridus HORT.) from cultured cormel. Asian Jr. of Microbiol. Biotech. Env. Sc: 2018, 19(2), 155-165.
30. Bielach, A.; Hrtyan, M.; Tognetti, V. B. Plants under stress: Involvement of auxin and cytokinin. InterJ Mol Sci: 2017,18, 1-29.
31. Voesenek, L.; Pierik, R.; Sasidharan, R. Plant Life without Ethylene. TrendPlant Sci: 2015, 20(12):783-786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.10.016
32. Qazi, A.; Nizamani, G. S.; Khan, M. T.; Yasmeen, S.; baloch, S. K.; Ali, M., ... Siddiqui, M. A. In-vitro management of phytohormones for micropropagation of sugarcane. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research: 2020, 33(1): 180-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjar/2020/33.1.180.191
33. Phillips, G. C.; Garda, M. Plant tissue culture media and practices: An overview. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. – Plant: 2019, 55(3):242–257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11627-019-09983-5.
34. Keerio, A. A.; Mangrio, G. S.; Keerio, M. I.; Soomro, N. S.; Nizamani, G. S.; Soomro, S. A.; ... Rattar, Q. A. Effect of different phytohormones on micropropagation of banana (Musa sp.) cultivars and their assessment through RAPD. Pure and Applied Biology (PAB): 2018, 7(3), 1074-1084. http://dx.doi.org/10.19045/bspab.2018.700126
35. Mansseri-Lamrioui, A.; Louerguioui, A.; Bonaly, J.; Yakoub-Bougdal, S.; Allili, N.; Gana-Kebbouche, S. Proliferation and rooting of wild cherry: The influence of cytokinin and auxin types and their concentration. African Journal of Biotechnology: 2011, 10(43), 8613-8624. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.450
36. Zhou, H.; Li, M.; Zhao, X.; Fan, X.; Guo, A. Plant regeneration from in vitro leaves of the peach rootstock 'Nemaguard' (Prunus persica× P. davidiana). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC): 2010, 101, 79-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-010-9666-z
37. Jain, S.M.; Gupta, P.K. (Eds.). Step Wise Protocols for Somatic Embryogenesis of Important Woody Plants: Volume II. Springer. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79087-9
38. Ahmad, A.; Ahmad, N.; Anis, M. Preconditioning of nodal explants in thidiazuron-supplemented liquid media improves shoot multiplication in Pterocarpus marsupium (Roxb.). Thidiazuron: from urea derivative to plant growth regulator: 2018, 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8004-3_8
39. Javed, S. B.; Alatar, A. A.; Anis, M.; El-Sheikh, A. M. In vitro regeneration of coral tree from three different explants using thidiazuron. HortTechnology hortte: 2019, 29, 946–951.
40. Dewir, Y. H.; Nurmansyah, Naidoo, Y. et al. Thidiazuron-induced abnormalities in plant tissue cultures. Plant Cell Rep: 2018, 37, 1451–1470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-018-2326-1
41. Sreelekshmi, R.; Siril, E. A. (2021). Effective reversal of hyperhydricity leading to efficient micropropagation of Dianthus chinensis L. 3 Biotech, 11, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-021-02645-7
42. Bayraktar, M.; Hayta-Smedley, S.; Unal, S.; Varol, N.; Gurel, A. Micropropagation and prevention of hyperhydricity in olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivar 'Gemlik'. South African Journal of Botany: 2020, 128, 264-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2019.11.022
43. Zárate-Salazar, J. R.; de Souza, L. M.; de Morais, M. B.; Neto, L. P.; Willadino, L.; Gouveia-Neto, A.; Ulisses, C. Light-emitting diodes and gas exchange facilitation minimize hyperhydricity in Lippia grata: Physiological, biochemical and morpho anatomical aspects. South African journal of botany: 2020, 135, 164-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2020.08.019
44. Gao, H.; Xia, X.; An, L.; Xin, X.; Liang, Y. Reversion of hyperhydricity in pink (Dianthus chinensis L.) plantlets by AgNO3 and its associated mechanism during in vitro culture. Plant Science: 2017, 254, 1-11.
45. Kabylbekova, B.; Kovalchuk, I.; Mukhitdinova, Z.; Turdiyev, T.; Kairova, G.; Madiyeva, G.; Reed, B. M. Reduced major minerals and increased minor nutrients improve micropropagation in three apple cultivars. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant: 2020, 56, 335-349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-019-10019-1
46. Bautista-Montes, E.; Hernández-Soriano, L.; Simpson, J. Advances in the micropropagation and genetic transformation of Agave species. Plants, 2022, 11(13), 1757. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11131757
47. Vasconcelos, T. N.; Dias, L. L. C.; Souza, J. M. T.; Alves, E. U.; Oliveira, V.; Costa, A. A. In vitro rooting of passion fruit BRS Rubi: applications of different concentrations of indole-3-butyric acid. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 2017, 39(4), e-558.
48. Tomar, P. C.; Lakshmi, G. M. In vitro rooting of Arachis hypogaea L. using different auxins. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 2018, 7(5), 2876-2880.
49. Sen, S.; Bal, S. In vitro rooting of Hemidesmus indicus (L.) R.Br. ex Schult. using different auxins. The Bioscan: 2019, 14(2), 1287-1290.
50. Liu, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Ren, H., Li, X. Comparison of three auxins on in vitro rooting of several varieties of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Plant Archives: 2020, 20(1), 1151-1155.
51. Khan, M. I. R.; Trivellini, A.; Fatma, M.; Masood, A.; Francini, A.; Iqbal, N. Role of Ethylene in Responses of Plants to Nitrogen Availability. In Plant Signaling Molecules: 2019, 159-175. Springer, Singapore.
52. Rathore, N.; Shekhawat, N. S. In vitro rooting of Withania somnifera using different concentrations of auxins. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 2021, 10(5), 1536-1542.
53. Islam, S. N.; Yeasmin, L.; Bashar, K. K.; Mahmud, R.; Amin, M. N. In vitro rooting of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) in different concentrations of IBA and NAA. Plant Cell Biotechnology and Molecular Biology: 2020, 21(5-6), 295-304.
54. Kulkarni, P. S.; Geetha, K. A. In vitro root induction in Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal and comparative analysis of withanolides in in vitro and greenhouse grown plants. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC): 2016, 125(3), 487-497.
55. Sharafi, A.; Sohi, H. H.; Azadi, P. In vitro rooting of micropropagated shoots of Rosa hybrida L. 'Red One' with indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) and α-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA). Journal of Ornamental Plants: 2017, 7(2), 121-126.
56. Yancheva, S. D.; Mihailova, G.M.; Vassilevska-Ivanova, R. M. Influence of different auxins on the in vitro rooting and acclimatization of Dianthus caryophyllus L. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum: 2018, 40(7), 130.
57. Gomes, A.P.S.; Gonçalves, A. N. In vitro rooting of Hancornia speciosa Gomes using different concentrations of IBA and NAA. African Journal of Biotechnology: 2019, 18(2), 53-58.
58. Pereira, J.; Fortes, G. Protocol for potato propagative material production in liquid medium. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira: 2003, 38(9), 1035-1043. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2003000900003
59. Pérez-Tornero, O.; Porras I.; García-Férriz, L.; Seguí-Simarro, J. M. Cytokinins and their Function in the Shoot Apical Meristem of Potato In Vitro. In: Loyola-Vargas V., Ochoa-Alejo N. (eds) Plant Cell Culture Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology: 2019, 1983.
60. Gajdošová, S.; Spíchal, L.; Kamínek, M.; Hoyerová, K.; Novák, O.; Dobrev, P. I.; Galuszka, P.; Klíma, P.; Gaudinová, A.; Zizková, E.; Hanuš, J.; Dančák, M.; Trávníček, B.; Pešek, B.; Krupička, M.; Vaňková R.; Strnad, M.; Motyka, V. (2011). Distribution, Biological Activities, Metabolism, and the Conceivable Function of Cytokinins in Plants. In: Litwińczuk W. (eds) Phytohormones. InTechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/17128
61. Antony, G.; Zhou, J.; Huang S.; Li, T., Liu, B., White, F. () Rice xa13 Recessive Resistance to Bacterial Blight is Defeated by Induction of the Disease Susceptibility Gene Os-11N3. The Plant Cell: 2010, 22(11), 3864-3876. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.110.078964
62. Singh, S. K., Rai, M. K., Asthana, P., Sigh, A., Jaiswal, U. Role of Cytokinins in Micropropagation of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) - A Review. Vegetos: 2019, 32, 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42535-018-00033-6
63. Silva-Sanzana, C.; Celiz-Balboa, J.; Garate-Novillo, F.; Sáez, M.; Figueroa, N.; Poblete, L.; Pérez-Díaz, R.; García-Robledo, M.; Palma-Canales, R.; Zúñiga-Feest, A.; Arce-Johnson, P. Cytokinins are Initial Targets of Light in the Control of Bud Outgrowth. Plant Physiology, 2015, 169(2): 00548. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00548
64. Rahman, M. A.; Hossain, M.; Islam, M. R.; Molla, M. R.; Rashid, M. H.; Nasrin, S. () In vitro Multiplication of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Using Different Cytokinins. Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research: 2021, 27(2), 1654-1662. https://doi.org/10.18801/jbar.270221.241
65. Pineda, A., Hernández, A. y Díaz, H. (2021). Multiplicación y reducción del crecimiento in vitro de papa chaucha (Solanum tuberosum L. grupo Phureja). Manglar, 18(2), 123-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.17268/manglar.2021.016
66. James, M. (2022). Efecto de tres elicitores sobre cultivo de papa (Solanum tuberosum L.) en condiciones in vitro y en campo [Tesis de pregrado, UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE NUEVA LEÓN]. http://eprints.uanl.mx/23188/1/1080127281.pdf
67. Khadiga, G.; Rasheid, S.; Mutasim, M. Effect of Cultivar and Growth Regulator on In vitro Micropropagation of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). American-Eurasian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture: 2009, 3(3), 487-492.
68. Pal, A.; Acharya, K.; Ahuja, P. Endogenous auxin level is a critical determinant for in vitro adventitious shoot regeneration in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology: 2012, 21(2), 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-011-0092-z
69. Kumar, G.; Thakur, M. Effect of gibberellic acid on in vitro microtuberization in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry: 2016, 5(3), 222-224.
70. Kumar, A.; Srivastava, K. Effect of gibberellic acid and kinetin on in vitro shoot multiplication in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). International Journal of Chemical Studies: 2017, 5(6), 1460-1463.
71. Rashid, M. H. A.; Akter, N. In vitro micropropagation of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) using gibberellic acid. Plant Archives: 2019, 19(1), 470-474.
72. Thakur, M.; Dhiman, A. Gibberellic acid-induced shoot regeneration from nodal segments of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). The Pharma Innovation Journal: 2020, 9(9), 600-602.
73. Shah, S. M. M.; et al. Effect of gibberellic acid (GA3) and kinetin on in vitro shoot multiplication of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology: 2021, 26(4), 779-785.
74. Ali, S.; Khan, N., Nouroz, F.; Erum, S.; Nasim, W.; Shahid, M. In vitro effects of GA3 on morphogenesis of CIP potato explants and acclimatization of plantlets in field. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology – Plant: 2018, 54(1), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-017-9874-x
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Categorías
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Authors who publish with BioNatura Journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the BioNatura Institutional Publishing Consortium (BIPC) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
