PEER REVIEW
Once a manuscript is submitted, it undergoes a prompt evaluation by the Editor-in-Chief and/or the editorial board of the journal. If the manuscript is deemed unsuitable due to reasons such as misalignment with the journal's scope, a swift response will be provided. For manuscripts passing this initial assessment, they proceed to the peer-review process, where reviewers conduct their evaluations.
Reviewers will be selected from internationally recognized researchers and clinicians according to the scope of the article. We also use the Web of Science reviewer search engine for this purpose. Each article is then evaluated by members of the editorial board specializing in the topic and three independent reviewers.
The journal employs a strict double-blind peer review process. Both the reviewers and the authors remain anonymous throughout the entire review process, ensuring impartiality and objectivity.