Analysis of the feelings in the reviews of patients versus the evaluation of the ease of use, effectiveness, and satisfaction of prescribed medications

Authors

  • Carlos Agudelo-Santos Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras
  • Jose Isaac Zablah Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70099/BJ/2024.01.01.24

Keywords:

Natural language processing, sentiment analysis, BERT, medication satisfaction

Abstract

The sentimental polarity of patients' medical treatments is decisive for therapeutic adherence, especially in managing chronic diseases. Patients value the effects of medications differently, while health personnel do it from a practical perspective. For this, patient reviews have been taken in unstructured text to the diversity of drugs available on the WebMD site. A numerical assessment accompanies these data on a Likert scale of the variables for "EaseofUse", "Effectiveness," and "Satisfaction". Using an NLP model called RoBERTa; the opinions have been analyzed, finding that neutral opinions are maintained against positive scales of "EaseofUse" and "Effectiveness," but negative opinions regarding "Satisfaction," where the evaluations are divided into the extremes. The analysis has been done statistically using frequencies and diagrams of pairs between feelings and variables of interest.

References

1. Naidu A. Factors affecting patient satisfaction and healthcare quality. Int J Health Care Qual Assur, 2009, 22(4):366–81. DOI:10.1108/09526860910964834

2. Ferrand YB, Siemens J, Weathers D, Fredendall LD, Choi Y, Pirrallo RG, et al. Patient satisfaction with healthcare services A critical review. Qual Manag J, 2016, 23(4):6–22. DOI: 10.1080/10686967.2016.11918486

3. King G, Lam P, Roberts ME. Computer‐assisted keyword and document set discovery from unstructured text. Am J Pol Sci, 2017, 61(4):971–88. DOI:10.1111/ajps.12291

4. Borodkin A, Lisin E, Strielkowski W. Data algorithms for processing and analysis of unstructured text documents. Appl Math Sci, 2014, 8:1213–22. DOI:10.12988/ams.2014.4125

5. Locke S, Bashall A, Al-Adely S, Moore J, Wilson A, Kitchen GB. Natural language processing in medicine: A review. Tren Anaesth Crit Care, 2021, 38:4–9. DOI:10.1016/j.tacc.2021.02.007

6. Harrison CJ, Sidey-Gibbons CJ. Machine learning in medicine: a practical introduction to natural language processing. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2021, 21(1). DOI:10.1186/s12874-021-01347-1

7. Pandita R. Internet a change agent: An overview of internet penetration and growth across the world. Int J Inf Dissem Technol, 2017, 7(2):83. DOI:10.5958/2249-5576.2017.00001.2

8. Devlin J, Chang M-W, Lee K, Toutanova K. BERT: Pretraining of deep bidirectional Transformers for language understanding. arXiv [cs.CL], 2018. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1810.04805

9. Liu Y, Ott M, Goyal N, Du J, Joshi M, Chen D, et al. RoBERTa: A robustly optimized BERT pretraining approach. arXiv [cs.CL], 2019. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1907.11692

10. Brown TB, Mann B, Ryder N, Subbiah M, Kaplan J, Dhariwal P, et al. Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. arXiv [cs.CL], 2020. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2005.14165

11. Zhang L, Wang S, Liu B. Deep learning for sentiment analysis: A survey. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov, 2018, 8(4). DOI:10.1002/widm.1253

12. Feldman R. Techniques and applications for sentiment analysis. Commun ACM, 2013, 56(4):82–9. DOI:10.1145/2436256.2436274

13. Liu Z, Li G, Cheng J. Hardware acceleration of fully quantized BERT for efficient natural language processing. In: 2021 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE). IEEE; 2021.

14. Leeson W, Resnick A, Alexander D, Rovers J. Natural language processing (NLP) in qualitative public health research: A proof of concept study. Int J Qual Methods, 2019, 18:160940691988702. DOI:10.1177/1609406919887021

15. Albaum G. The Likert scale revisited. J Mark Res Soc, 1997, 39(2):1–21. DOI:10.1177/147078539703900202

16. Krotov V, Johnson L, Silva L, Legality and ethics of web scraping. Commun Assoc Inf Syst, 2020, 47:539–63. DOI:10.17705/1cais.04724

17. WebMD's A to Z drug database. Available online: https://www.webmd.com/drugs/2/index (accessed on 6 September 2023)

18. Loureiro D, Barbieri F, Neves L, Anke LE, Camacho-Collados J. TimeLMs: Diachronic language models from Twitter. arXiv [cs.CL], 2022. DOI:10.48550/ARXIV.2202.03829

19. Barbieri F, Anke LE, Camacho-Collados J. XLM-T: Multilingual language models in Twitter for sentiment analysis and beyond. arXiv [cs.CL], 2021. DOI: 10.48550/ARXIV.2104.12250

20. Barbieri F, Camacho-Collados J, Neves L, Espinosa-Anke L. TweetEval: Unified benchmark and comparative evaluation for tweet classification. arXiv [cs.CL], 2020. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2010.12421

21. Mohammad S, Bravo-Marquez F, Salameh M, Kiritchenko S. SemEval-2018 Task 1: Affect in Tweets. In: Proceedings of The 12th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics; 2018.

22. Rosenthal S, Farra N, Nakov P. SemEval-2017 Task 4: Sentiment Analysis in Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2017). Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics; 2017.

23. Python. Available online: https://www.python.org/ (accessed on 6 September 2023)

24. Notepad++. Available online: https://notepad-plus-plus.org/ (accessed on 6 September 2023)

25. Pip 23.2.1. Available online: https://pypi.org/project/pip/ (accessed on 6 September 2023)

26. Linode. Available online: https://www.linode.com/ (accessed on 6 September 2023)

27. CentOS stream 9. Available online: https://centos.org/stream9/ (accessed on 6 September 2023)

28. Rajput A. Natural language processing, sentiment analysis, and clinical analytics. In: Innovation in Health Informatics. Elsevier; 2020. p. 79–97.

29. Aattouchi I, Elmendili S, Elmendili F. Sentiment analysis of health care: Review. E3S Web Conf, 2021, 319:01064. DOI:10.1051/e3sconf/202131901064

Downloads

Published

2024-03-15

How to Cite

Agudelo-Santos, C., & Isaac Zablah, J. (2024). Analysis of the feelings in the reviews of patients versus the evaluation of the ease of use, effectiveness, and satisfaction of prescribed medications. BioNatura Journal: Ibero-American Journal of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, 1(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.70099/BJ/2024.01.01.24

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Categories