Characterization of the Diversity of Microbial Communities in the Rhizosphere of Solanum betaceum in Response to Inoculation with Microbial Consortia Under Cultivation Condition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70099/BJ/2025.02.01.16Keywords:
Bioinoculation, rhizosphere, microbial communities, Solanum betaceum, metagenomicsAbstract
Bioinoculation with native or introduced microorganisms is a promising alternative to using synthetic chemicals in agriculture, although its impact on the microbial communities of the rhizosphere is still poorly understood. This study analyzed the microbial community of the rhizosphere of Solanum betaceum (tree tomato) over 120 days, using a metagenomic approach to evaluate microbial diversity and the persistence of Trichoderma spp. through PCR. The predominant phyla identified were Pseudomonadota and Actinomycetota, and the most abundant genera were Streptomyces, Nocardioides, Bradyrhizobium, Sphingomonas, Rhodanobacter, and Micromonospora. While the microbial composition changed over time, diversity indices did not show significant differences before and after inoculation, and the establishment of Trichoderma spp. in the rhizosphere was not observed. These findings provide insight into the complex interactions between residents and introduced microorganisms, offering a basis for future studies. The results suggest that frequent inoculation alone was insufficient to change the diversity of rhizosphere microbial communities noticeably. It is recommended that research be expanded to other geographical conditions to deepen the understanding of the microbial profile of the S. betaceum rhizosphere and its application in different crops.
References
1. Kuzyakov Y, Blagodatskaya E. Microbial hotspots and hot moments in soil: Concept & review. Soil Biol Biochem. abril de 2015;83:184-99.
2. Berendsen RL, Pieterse CM, Bakker PA. The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends Plant Sci. 2012;17(8):478-86.
3. Olanrewaju OS, Ayangbenro AS, Glick BR, Babalola OO. Plant health: feedback effect of root exudates-rhizobiome interactions. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. febrero de 2019;103(3):1155-66.
4. Singh BK, Trivedi P, Egidi E, Macdonald CA, Delgado-Baquerizo M. Crop microbiome and sustainable agriculture. Nat Rev Microbiol. noviembre de 2020;18(11):601-2.
5. Singh JS, Pandey VC, Singh DP. Efficient soil microorganisms: A new dimension for sustainable agriculture and environmental development. Agric Ecosyst Environ. marzo de 2011;140(3-4):339-53.
6. Acosta-Quezada PG, Raigón MD, Riofrío-Cuenca T, García-Martínez MD, Plazas M, Burneo JI, et al. Diversity for chemical composition in a collection of different varietal types of tree tomato (Solanum betaceum Cav.), an Andean exotic fruit. Food Chem. 2015;169:327-35.
7. Prohens J, Nuez F. The tamarillo (Cyphomandra betacea) a review of a promising small fruit crop. Small Fruits Rev. 2001;1(2):43-68.
8. Acosta-Quezada PG, Vilanova S, Martínez-Laborde JB, Prohens J. Genetic diversity and relationships in accessions from different cultivar groups and origins in the tree tomato (Solanum betaceum Cav.). Euphytica. 2012;187(1):87-97.
9. Bohs L. Phylogeny of the Cyphomandra clade of the genus Solanum (Solanaceae) based on ITS sequence data. Taxon. 2007;56(4):1012-26.
10. Mertz C, Gancel AL, Gunata Z, Alter P, Dhuique-Mayer C, Vaillant F, et al. Phenolic compounds, carotenoids and antioxidant activity of three tropical fruits. J Food Compos Anal. 2009;22(5):381-7.
11. Orrico G, Ulloa S, Medina M. Efecto de los hongos micorrícicos arbusculares y Pseudomonas fluorescens en el control de Meloidogyne spp. en plantas de tomate de árbol (Solanum betaceum). Rev Cienc. 2013;15(1):1390-1117.
12. Vasco C, Avila J, Ruales J, Svanberg U, Kamal-Eldin A. Physical and chemical characteristics of golden-yellow and purple-red varieties of tamarillo fruit (Solanum betaceum Cav.). Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2009;60(sup7):278-88.
13. Barnett H, Hunter B. Illustrated genera of imperfect fungi. Am Phytopathol Soc. 1998;(4th ed).
14. Gams W, Bissett J. Morphology and identification of Trichoderma and Gliocladium. Trichoderma and Gliocladium. 1998;3-31.
15. Harman GE, Howell CR, Viterbo A, Chet I, Lorito M. Trichoderma species—opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2(1):43-56.
16. Moťková P, Vytřasová J. Comparison of methods for isolating fungal DNA. Czech J Food Sci. 4 de enero de 2012;29(Special Issue):S76-85.
17. Hagn A, Wallisch S, Radl V, Charles Munch J, Schloter M. A new cultivation independent approach to detect and monitor common Trichoderma species in soils. J Microbiol Methods. abril de 2007;69(1):86-92.
18. Cordier C, Alabouvette C. Effects of the introduction of a biocontrol strain of Trichoderma atroviride on non target soil microorganisms. Eur J Soil Biol. mayo de 2009;45(3):267-74.
19. Risoli S, Cotrozzi L, Sarrocco S, Nuzzaci M, Pellegrini E, Vitti A. Trichoderma-Induced Resistance to Botrytis cinerea in Solanum Species: A Meta-Analysis. Plants. 11 de enero de 2022;11(2):180.
20. Scherwinski K, Wolf A, Berg G. Assessing the risk of biological control agents on the indigenous microbial communities: Serratia plymuthica HRO-C48 and Streptomyces sp. HRO-71 as model bacteria. BioControl. 2007;52:87-112.
21. Kurkjian HM, Akbari MJ, Momeni B. The impact of interactions on invasion and colonization resistance in microbial communities. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021;17(1):e1008643.
22. Wu J, Zhu J, Zhang D, Cheng H, Hao B, Cao A, et al. Beneficial effect on the soil microenvironment of Trichoderma applied after fumigation for cucumber production. Nazir R, editor. PLOS ONE. 2 de agosto de 2022;17(8):e0266347.
23. He X, Wang Y. Effects of Regulated Deficit Irrigation on soil nutrient, microorganism and enzyme activity of Isatis indigotica. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 1 de enero de 2021;632(2):022025.
24. Li H, Wang H, Jia B, Li D, Fang Q, Li R. Irrigation has a higher impact on soil bacterial abundance, diversity and composition than nitrogen fertilization. Sci Rep. 19 de agosto de 2021;11(1):16901.
25. Konappa N, Krishnamurthy S, Arakere UC, Chowdappa S, Ramachandrappa NS. Efficacy of indigenous plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and Trichoderma strains in eliciting resistance against bacterial wilt in a tomato. Egypt J Biol Pest Control. diciembre de 2020;30(1):106.
26. Zheng X, Zhu Y, Wang J, Wang Z, Liu B. Combined use of a microbial restoration substrate and avirulent Ralstonia solanacearum for the control of tomato bacterial wilt. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):20091.
27. Ji T, Guo X, Wu F, Wei M, Li J, Ji P, et al. Proper irrigation amount for eggplant cultivation in a solar greenhouse improved plant growth, fruit quality and yield by influencing the soil microbial community and rhizosphere environment. Front Microbiol. 23 de septiembre de 2022;13:981288.
28. Rodriguez JC, Turini T, Wang D, Hale L. Impacts of deficit irrigation and organic amendments on soil microbial populations and yield of processing tomatoes. Appl Soil Ecol. diciembre de 2022;180:104625.
29. Aydi Ben Abdallah R, Jabnoun-Khiareddine H, Ayed F, Daami-Remadi M. A Three-Year Study of Comparative Effects of Four Organic Amendments on Soil Health Dynamics, Tomato Production, and Rhizosphere Microbial Community. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 25 de septiembre de 2023;54(17):2439-58.
30. Buckley DH, Schmidt TM. Diversity and dynamics of microbial communities in soils from agroecosystems. Environ Microbiol. 2003;5(6):441-52.
31. Compant S, Samad A, Faist H, Sessitsch A. A review on the plant microbiome: Ecology, functions, and emerging trends in microbial application. J Adv Res. 2019;19:29-37.
32. DeBruyn JM, Nixon LT, Fawaz MN, Johnson AM, Radosevich M. Global Biogeography and Quantitative Seasonal Dynamics of Gemmatimonadetes in Soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. septiembre de 2011;77(17):6295-300.
33. Lipson DA. Relationships between temperature responses and bacterial community structure along seasonal and altitudinal gradients. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007;59(2):418-27.
34. Yan L, Zhang W, Duan W, Zhang Y, Zheng W, Lai X. Temporal Bacterial Community Diversity in the Nicotiana tabacum Rhizosphere Over Years of Continuous Monocropping. Front Microbiol. 25 de mayo de 2021;12:641643.
35. Anees M, Tronsmo A, Edel-Hermann V, Hjeljord LG, Héraud C, Steinberg C. Characterization of field isolates of Trichoderma antagonistic against Rhizoctonia solani. Fungal Biol. 2010;114(9):691-701.
36. Ferreira FV, Musumeci MA. Trichoderma as biological control agent: Scope and prospects to improve efficacy. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021;37(5):1-17.
37. Howell C. Mechanisms employed by Trichoderma species in the biological control of plant diseases: the history and evolution of current concepts. Plant Dis. 2003;87(1):4-10.
38. Liu L, Huang X, Zhang J, Cai Z, Jiang K, Chang Y. Deciphering the relative importance of soil and plant traits on the development of rhizosphere microbial communities. Soil Biol Biochem. septiembre de 2020;148:107909.
39. Setälä H, Berg MP, Jones TH. Trophic structure and functional redundancy in soil communities. Biol Divers Funct Soils. 2005;236-49.
40. Wolińska A. Metagenomic Achievements in Microbial Diversity Determination in Croplands. En: Microbial Diversity in the Genomic Era [Internet]. Elsevier; 2019 [citado 17 de noviembre de 2024]. p. 15-35. Disponible en: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780128148495000022
41. Dai Z, Su W, Chen H, Barberán A, Zhao H, Yu M, et al. Long‐term nitrogen fertilization decreases bacterial diversity and favors the growth of Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria in agroecosystems across the globe. Glob Change Biol. agosto de 2018;24(8):3452-61.
42. Mendes R, Raaijmakers JM. Cross-kingdom similarities in microbiome functions. ISME J. 1 de septiembre de 2015;9(9):1905-7.
43. Xun W, Li W, Xiong W, Ren Y, Liu Y, Miao Y, et al. Diversity-triggered deterministic bacterial assembly constrains community functions. Nat Commun. 23 de agosto de 2019;10(1):3833.
44. Gu Y, Banerjee S, Dini-Andreote F, Xu Y, Shen Q, Jousset A, et al. Small changes in rhizosphere microbiome composition predict disease outcomes earlier than pathogen density variations. ISME J. 1 de octubre de 2022;16(10):2448-56.
45. Lee SM, Kong HG, Song GC, Ryu CM. Disruption of Firmicutes and Actinobacteria abundance in tomato rhizosphere causes the incidence of bacterial wilt disease. ISME J. 1 de enero de 2021;15(1):330-47.
46. Padilla N, Luengo P, Mancilla S, Maurin A, Torres C, Ruiz P, et al. Antagonistic activity of endophytic actinobacteria from native potatoes (Solanum tuberosum subsp. tuberosum L.) against Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum and Pectobacterium atrosepticum. BMC Microbiol. diciembre de 2021;21(1):335.
47. Zuluaga MYA, Lima Milani KM, Azeredo Gonçalves LS, Martinez De Oliveira AL. Diversity and plant growth-promoting functions of diazotrophic/N-scavenging bacteria isolated from the soils and rhizospheres of two species of Solanum. Borruso L, editor. PLOS ONE. 10 de enero de 2020;15(1):e0227422.
48. Dias MP, Bastos MS, Xavier VB, Cassel E, Astarita LV, Santarém ER. Plant growth and resistance promoted by Streptomyces spp. in tomato. Plant Physiol Biochem. septiembre de 2017;118:479-93.
49. Nonthakaew N, Panbangred W, Songnuan W, Intra B. Plant growth-promoting properties of Streptomyces spp. isolates and their impact on mung bean plantlets' rhizosphere microbiome. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:967415.
50. Passari AK, Upadhyaya K, Singh G, Abdel-Azeem AM, Thankappan S, Uthandi S, et al. Enhancement of disease resistance, growth potential, and photosynthesis in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) by inoculation with an endophytic actinobacterium, Streptomyces thermocarboxydus strain BPSAC147. Virolle MJ, editor. PLOS ONE. 3 de julio de 2019;14(7):e0219014.
51. Zheng X, Wang J, Chen Z, Zhang H, Wang Z, Zhu Y, et al. A Streptomyces sp. strain: Isolation, identification, and potential as a biocontrol agent against soilborne diseases of tomato plants. Biol Control. septiembre de 2019;136:104004.
52. Favero VO, Carvalho RH, Motta VM, Leite ABC, Coelho MRR, Xavier GR, et al. Bradyrhizobium as the Only Rhizobial Inhabitant of Mung Bean (Vigna radiata) Nodules in Tropical Soils: A Strategy Based on Microbiome for Improving Biological Nitrogen Fixation Using Bio-Products. Front Plant Sci. 12 de enero de 2021;11:602645.
53. Favero VO, De Carvalho RH, Leite ABC, Dos Santos DMT, De Freitas KM, Boddey RM, et al. Bradyrhizobium strains from Brazilian tropical soils promote increases in nodulation, growth and nitrogen fixation in mung bean. Appl Soil Ecol. julio de 2022;175:104461.
54. Saranraj P, Sivasakthivelan P, Al-Tawaha ARM, Sudha A, Al-Tawaha AR, Sirajuddin SN, et al. Diversity and evolution of Bradyrhizobium communities relating to Soybean cultivation: A review. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 1 de junio de 2021;788(1):012208.
55. Schneijderberg M, Schmitz L, Cheng X, Polman S, Franken C, Geurts R, et al. A genetically and functionally diverse group of non-diazotrophic Bradyrhizobium spp. colonizes the root endophytic compartment of Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. diciembre de 2018;18(1):61.
56. Zilli JÉ, Pacheco RS, Gianluppi V, Smiderle OJ, Urquiaga S, Hungria M. Biological N2 fixation and yield performance of soybean inoculated with Bradyrhizobium. Nutr Cycl Agroecosystems. abril de 2021;119(3):323-36.
57. Ma Y, Wang J, Liu Y, Wang X, Zhang B, Zhang W, et al. Nocardioides: “Specialists” for Hard-to-Degrade Pollutants in the Environment. Molecules. 5 de noviembre de 2023;28(21):7433.
58. Yan L, Liang B, Qi MY, Wang AJ, Liu ZP. Degrading characterization of the Newly Isolated Nocardioides sp. N39 for 3-Amino-5-methyl-isoxazole and the Related Genomic Information. Microorganisms. 25 de julio de 2022;10(8):1496.
59. Asaf S, Numan M, Khan AL, Al-Harrasi A. Sphingomonas : from diversity and genomics to functional role in environmental remediation and plant growth. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 17 de febrero de 2020;40(2):138-52.
60. Zhou M, Liu Z, Wang J, Zhao Y, Hu B. Sphingomonas Relies on Chemotaxis to Degrade Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Maintain Dominance in Coking Sites. Microorganisms. 27 de mayo de 2022;10(6):1109.
61. Prakash O, Green SJ, Singh P, Jasrotia P, Kostka JE. Stress-related ecophysiology of members of the genus Rhodanobacter isolated from a mixed waste contaminated subsurface. Front Environ Sci Eng. abril de 2021;15(2):23.
62. Woo H, Kim I, Chhetri G, Park S, Lee H, Yook S, et al. Two Novel Bacterial Species, Rhodanobacter lycopersici sp. nov. and Rhodanobacter geophilus sp. nov., Isolated from the Rhizosphere of Solanum lycopersicum with Plant Growth-Promoting Traits. Microorganisms. 3 de noviembre de 2024;12(11):2227.
63. Hifnawy MS, Fouda MM, Sayed AM, Mohammed R, Hassan HM, AbouZid SF, et al. The genus Micromonospora as a model microorganism for bioactive natural product discovery. RSC Adv. 2020;10(35):20939-59.
64. Hirsch AM, Valdés M. Micromonospora: An important microbe for biomedicine and potentially for biocontrol and biofuels. Soil Biol Biochem. abril de 2010;42(4):536-42.
65. Malisorn K, Embaen S, Sribun A, Saeng-In P, Phongsopitanun W, Tanasupawat S. Identification and antimicrobial activities of Streptomyces, Micromonospora, and Kitasatospora strains from rhizosphere soils. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2020;10(2):123-8.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with BioNatura Journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the BioNatura Institutional Publishing Consortium (BIPC) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.