Determination of water quality through using bioindicators, physical-chemical and microbiological analysis of the lagoon Santo Domingo of the national park Cotopaxi, province of Pichincha, period 2018

Authors

  • Karen Nathali Ceballos Peñafiel Instituto Superior Tecnológico General Eloy Alfaro (ISTGEA), La Joya de los Sachas, 220101
  • Moisés Alejandro Quishpe Guanoluisa Instituto Superior Tecnológico General Eloy Alfaro (ISTGEA), La Joya de los Sachas, 220101

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70099/BJ/2024.01.01.4

Keywords:

water, analysis, bioindicators, quality, indices, lagoon

Abstract

The current research project carried out in the Santo Domingo Lagoon of the Cotopaxi National Park, a
Protected Area that is located in the canton of Mejia, province of Pichincha, and retains their transcendental
goal to determine the water quality from the application of bioindicators and physical-chemical and
microbiological laboratory analysis.
They obtained results about the quality of water using bioindicators according to the methodology used
(scientific induction, inductive, deductive, measurement, quantitative), where samples were taken at five
specific points of entry and exit of the lake body in April, May and June, making use of water quality
identification techniques for tolerance; Biological Monitoring Working Part (BMWP/Col.), Ephemeroptera,
Plecoptera, Tricoptera (EPT), Andean Biotic Index (ABI), and Biotic Index of Families (IBF). Meanwhile,
the environmental quality indices were used for the physical, chemical and microbiological analysis: DINUS
- Fundación Nacional de Saneamiento (NFS), defining that the water conditions are wrong or contaminated.
By contrast, from the application of the BMWP/Col. and ABI indices, the water quality pertains to waters of
questionable and critical condition.
However, with the application of the BMWP/Col. and ABI indices, it was defined that the water quality
corresponds to waters of doubtful and critical condition, which are, in conclusion, very contaminated waters.
On the other hand, one of the techniques for using bioindicators from the IBF index yielded a different result
in areas of apparent organic contamination, determining that the Santo Domingo Lagoon demonstrates an
"excellent" indicator.

References

Segnini S. The use of benthic macroinvertebrates as indicators of the ecological condition of flowing water bodies. Ecotropics. 2003;16(2):45-63.

Romero H. Contamination of water, soil and air. Barcelona: Herder; 2015.

(SIT) SIoT. Biological Question of Oxygen. 2006.

Carrera C, Fierro K. The aquatic macroinvertebrates as indicators of water quality: Monitoring manual. In: EcoScience. Quito - Ecuador; 2001. p. 67.

Brown R, McCleland N. Water Quality Index. Application in the Kansas River Basin. 1973.

Ríos Touma B, et al. The Andean Biotic Index (ABI): revised tolerance to pollution values for macroinvertebrate families and index performance evaluation. España; 2014.

Resh VH, Myers MJ, Hannaford MJ. Macroinvertebrates as biotic indicators of environmental quality. In: Hauer FR, Lamberti GA, editors. Methods in Stream Ecology. San Diego; 1996. p. 647-668.

Roldán G. Bioindication of water quality in Colombia: Use of the BMWP/Col method. Colombia: University of Antioquia; 2003. p. 164.

SH D. Design of an Index of Water Quality. Water Resources Bulletin. 1987;833:843.

Mandaville S. Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Taxa Tolerance Values, Metrics, and Protocols Soil & Water Conservation Society of Metro Halifax. 2002.

Rosenberg DM, Resh VH. Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1993. p. 488.

Abdel Raouf, Homaidan, IBM Ibraheem. Microalgae and wastewater treatment. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2012;19:257-275.

American society for testing and materials. ABS (Annual book of Standards). 1994.

Determination of pH in water. Method ASTM D. 1990;1293:84.

Acosta R, Rieradevall M, Ríos B, Prat N. Proposal of a protocol for evaluating the ecological quality of andean rivers (CERA) and its application to two watersheds in Ecuador and Peru. Limnetica. 2009;35-64.

Tercedor A. Aquatic macroinvertebrates and river water quality. 1996.

Water Symposium in Andalucía (SIAGA). Memorias IV. Almeria Nº2. p. 203-213.

Alba Tercedor, Sanchez O. A quick and simple method to evaluate the biological quality of running water based on Hellawell. 1988.

Arocena R, Conde D. Methods in Ecology of Continental Waters, with Examples of Limnology in Uruguay. Montevideo: DIRAC/FC/UDELAR; 1999. p. 233.

Standard Test Methods for Chloride Ion in Water. In: American Society for Testing and Materials, USA, ASTM Committee on Standards. Hiladelphia PA; 1989. p. 481-484.

Brenes R RL. The water: its properties and its biological importance. 2015.

Chapman D. Water Quality Assessments: A Guide to the Use of Biota, Sediments and Water in Environmental Monitoring. London: Chapman, D; p. 626.

I C. Development of a biotic index to evaluate the ecological quality of water. 2000.

I C. Development of a biotic index to evaluate the ecological quality of water. 2000.

Sh D. Social Accounting System for Evaluating Water Resources. Water Resources Research. 1972;8(5):1159-1177.

Domínguez L, Goethals P, De Pauw N. Aspects of the physicochemical environment of the Chaguana river: a first step in the use of benthic macroinvertebrates in the evaluation of water quality. ESPOL Technological Journal. 2005:127-134.

W H. Rapid Field Assessments of Organic Pollution With A Family Level. 1988.

Biotic Index. Journal Of The North American Benthological Society. USA.

INEC. Population by sex, according to province, parish and registration district. [Online]. 2010 [cited 2023 Oct 15]. Available from: http://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/documentos/web-inec/Tabulados_CPV_2010.

INEN. Standard Ecuadorian NTE INEN 2. 1998. p. 169, 98.

A J. Macroinvertebrates: composition, life histories and production. Tropical stream ecology, chapter 4. 2008.

MAE. [Online]. 2017. Available from: http://suia.ambiente.gob.ec/documents/10179/1232803/Reporte+Registro+Visitas+2017+(hasta+septiembre).pdf/2d336694-0d3e-4d1b-8698-d5628fe03b37.

R M. Ecology. 1991. p. 951.

ORGANIZATION PH. Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality, criteria relative to the health and other information base. In: World Health Organization. Washington DC: Scientific Publication N° 506; 1987.

W O. Environmental indices, theory and practice, AA science, Ann Arbor. Michigan; 1978.

Ryding S, Rast W. The Control of Eutrophication in Lakes and Marshes. 1992.

Madrid and UNESCO. Paris: Pirámide. p. 375.

Shuval IH, et al. Health effects of nitrates in water. EPA; 1977. p. 600/1-1-77-030.

Simboni Ruiz N, Carvajal Y, Escobar J. Revision of physicochemical parameters as indicators of water quality and contamination. In: Engineering and Research. National University of Colombia; 2007. p. 172-181.

SNET. Proposals for the decontamination of the rivers Acelhuate, Sucio and Suquiapa. 2002.

National Service of Territorial Studies.

Valenzuela J. Exploration of possibilities to propose a train of treatments for hardness removal that achieves technical and economic optimization of the process. Mexico: Universidad de las Americas Puebla; 2004. p. 12-20.

Vázquez G, Castro G, González I, Pérez R, Castro T. Bioindicators as tools to determine water quality. 2006. p. 7.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-15

How to Cite

Ceballos Peñafiel, K. N., & Quishpe Guanoluisa, M. A. (2024). Determination of water quality through using bioindicators, physical-chemical and microbiological analysis of the lagoon Santo Domingo of the national park Cotopaxi, province of Pichincha, period 2018. BioNatura Journal: Ibero-American Journal of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, 1(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.70099/BJ/2024.01.01.4

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Categories